"Fuck the EU" - Conclusive proof that the US is meddling in the affairs of a soverign country 13:01 Feb 08 9 comments
Ukrainian anarchist dispels myths surrounding Euromaidan protests, warns of fascist influence 21:44 Jan 23 7 comments
Striking Nestle Worker Murdered 14:46 Nov 14 0 comments
Peace in Colombia: Reality, Myth and Wishful Thinking 20:13 May 18 0 commentsmore >>
Just another WordPress site
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
MAIN SERVER BACK UP AGAIN VINEYARDSAKER:
THIS BLOG HAS MOVED TO A NEW LOCATION VINEYARDSAKER:
The Prince Charles Black Spider Memos and Unreasonableness in the UK: The Resurgence of the Common L... Sat Mar 28, 2015 14:58 | Alan Greene
End Direct Provision: #DirectProvision15 Wed Mar 25, 2015 10:16 | GuestPost
Guest Post: 20 years after Beijing: let?s take a few steps back. Fri Mar 20, 2015 08:13 | GuestPost
Socio-Economic Rights, the Constitution and the ECHR Act 2003: O?Donnell v South Dublin County Counc... Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:53 | Liam Thornton
Final Workshop in the Northern/Irish Feminist Judgments Project. Mon Mar 16, 2015 09:35 | admin
For lefties too stubborn to quit
The Solar System live 15:31 Sat Mar 28, 2015 | WorldbyStorm
?Kathleen Lynn, a Truly Radical Woman? : Summer School ? July 18th 2015 14:36 Sat Mar 28, 2015 | WorldbyStorm
The Church and The Smiths 13:30 Sat Mar 28, 2015 | WorldbyStorm
A different future? more Soviet Space Art? 11:29 Sat Mar 28, 2015 | WorldbyStorm
This Weekend I?ll Mostly be Listening to? The Units 09:26 Sat Mar 28, 2015 | WorldbyStorm
Defend the right to form a Trade Union!
international | worker & community struggles and protests | feature Sunday June 29, 2008 18:30 by Jack White - WSM wsm_ireland at yahoo dot com
This Friday, the 4th of July marks the start of a week of actions against Lionbridge, a multinational translation and software development company in support of the right of workers to organise in trade unions.
The allegation was a lie and the information referred to is long in the public domain. It was certainly not confidential, in fact even the Irish Independent has written about it.
How did the company find out about it?
We made no secret of it - the existence of the union was announced publicly as soon as it was registered. We did not disclose the full membership of the union, which at first was over 15% of the 300 people employed in the Warsaw office.
The company made attempts to find out the full list of membership - which legally it is only allowed to do in case mass layoffs are planned. We knew there were no legal grounds for this request and we kept the membership secret, with the exception of elected trade-union representatives which are protected by the Labour Code. We expected problems, but we hoped the company would respect the Labor Code.
How did they react?
The first reactions were fairly typical. It started with comments about how "trade-unions are a threat to the competitiveness of a company", how "the US based headquarters of the company would decide to move production to non-unionised countries like China and India" and how "the Polish subsidiary would lose jobs because the trade-union was formed". The bosses made it sound like the trade-union is the worst thing that could happen to workers. That's not surprising to hear this type of statements from capitalists who benefit from other people's low wages - but it's sad to hear workers pick up this sort of thinking.
What did the company claim the reason for firing you was?
Of course they didn't say that I'm being fired because I am a trade-union organizer. The Polish Labour Code tries to protect elected union officials from being dismissed. They had to find other reasons. What they did, is actually common practice in Poland nowadays. They used the pretext that was used in dozens of other cases of dismissed union-members in Poland - the alleged disclosing of secret company information. Irish readers might not realize, but workers in Poland are not expected to speak about their salaries or working conditions with other workers or - god forbid - the press. This type of information is considered as an asset of the company that safeguards its competitiveness. Needless to say that workers bargaining power is hampered by this type of secrecy. And this is exactly what the bosses want. Coming back to the pretext used against me - I was accused of publishing an article that allegedly disclosed "secrets" and at the same time "untrue" information (how some piece of information can be at the same time "secret", presumably stolen and "untrue", presumably fabricated is beyond me). It was also argued that the article could damage the share price of the company, and nothing short of causing panic on the Wall Street. The fact that the company's shares kept falling steadily since the new Lionbridge management took control, after the acquisition of Bowne Global Solutions, did not matter. The low performance of the stock could not have been the effect of, say, the mismanagement of the company, could it? The fact that another person admitted having written the article did not matter either. It didn't even matter that the information contained in the article in question has been published months before by the mainstream press, including The Independent in Ireland, the Polish newspaper "Gazeta Wyborcza" and many other publications, including the Lionbridge website itself!.
What was the reaction of your collegues?
Management got what they wanted, at least for a while - my colleagues understood that unions are a scary business and preferred to step back and wait to see what will happen next. Even symbolic solidarity gestures, such as sending a protest letter to the management were harshly criticised as being "disloyal" and workers got a clear signal that any action on their part would mean them getting in trouble. At the same time, the management also offered them bonuses that seemed impossible to obtain just a few months before. All this combined ensured that the managers slowed down the development of a real workers representation in the workplace.
What is happening with your case now?
The first court hearing will take place on July 4th. This is the day a picket will be organized in front of different Lionbridge offices, including Dublin. The legal case I have filed against Lionbridge is fairly strong - in essence public information available on the internet for everyone to read cannot be treated as a secret. The company's lawyers must be aware of that if they are worth the money Lionbridge is paying them. It is usual that the Polish Labour Courts re-instate trade-union members dismissed from their workplaces.
However, it does not mean that the case will be over soon, as the company has a lot of money to spend on expensive lawyers and appeals.
Can you tell us about the demonstrations being organised in other countries?
Yes, demonstrations are planned in Poland, Slovakia, Spain, Denmark, Germany and the USA. We are trying to work with different networks and organizations concerned about workers rights and social justice, such as the International Workers' Association, Workers Solidarity Movement, Industrial Workers of the World and others...
What do you hope they will achieve?
It is quite probable that Lionbridge will be forced to undo their illegal dismissal and forced to show more consideration for basic workers rights in the future. I also hope that more self-organization amongst workers in Lionbridge will emerge as a result of the publicity around this case. This would be an unexpected outcome for the corporate managers who maybe hoped to crush the union movement once and for all.
There will be a picket placed on the office of Lionbridge in Dun Laoghaire on Friday the 4th of June from 1 to 2.
If you can make it along your support would be appreciated. The office is located at:
3 West Pier Business Campus
If you cannot make it out please consider contacting Lionbridge to let them know that you support Jakub and the right of workers to organise in Trade Unions:
Tel: 01 202 1200
Send a copy of the e-mail to the union: email@example.com